Talk:Blacklisting
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blacklisting article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1 year |
| WikiProject Human rights | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
| WikiProject United States | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
Principles. Appeals. Unfair or false blacklisting.[edit]
Around the Internet forums, listserv forums contributors, participants can unfairly get banned or blocked. What principles are there that can be invoked for reconsideration for an unfair ban or block? Or how can a permanent ban or block be reduced to a term that would allow the contributor, participant to return?
- Not sure what this question/thread is referring to. If you are trying to contact Wikipedia admins about a ban or similar this is the wrong talk page. DirkDouse (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
CLAC Blacklist[edit]
It notes "citation needed" after the bit I've put in quotes below, but should this be removed in the meantime? Also, I'm a bit confused as to why this article comes under the US - blacklisting is general enough and shouldn't be linked to a specific country. In the past, lists of union members have been shared or circulated between multiple organizations to prevent hiring of employees who have been critical of management or advocated on behalf of members of their profession. In Canada, CLAC operates such a blacklist.
No comments:
Post a Comment